I am home, safe and sound. Tomorrow there will be a big-ass post about how I met a Harcum college student who is secretly Superman, hate SEPTA workers, hate Amtrak, didn't get to the hotel until 3 am, lived on Twizzlers and Coke, pulled muscles, met my brother's girlfriend again, watched my brother graduate, and generally had the two days that never fucking ended. I am too tired now to do it.

Also... I'm getting Dean Evans as a thesis adviser (and presumably first reader), what? Baffled [livejournal.com profile] chasingtides is baffled.

But... would someone please explain the feminism wank in the Supernatural fandom? It seems to be reaching massively epic proportions and I'm still baffled. It could be lack of sleep, but... baffled. Maybe you could use small words? I dunno. But this whole OMGtheyallhatewomynsOMG and this whole issue with Malleus Maleficarum (where my biggest issue was the fact that WTF that ain't Sturbridge)... what? I am so, so lost.
ext_21906: (green car)

From: [identity profile] chasingtides.livejournal.com


I've actually been playing chase-the-wank, a skill I've honed with over 10 years in fandom and several in the neo-pagan community, both bastions of internet wankage. However, no matter how many posts I read, I'm still coming up really blank. A lot of it I'm looking at and going, "But... the world doesn't work like that," or, "But they're being cool and meta/actually doing their research." A lot of it is coming up the last one - this season, from what I've seen, is all about the Christian mythology. Christian mythology and theology and dogma is cool and way cracktastic, but it's not nice. It's very not nice. They're being accurate, which counts in my books, but they're not being PC. And then I'm seeing the fan community being conflated with show (in terms of Bela).

Basically, is there any way to explain it, since links and chase-the-wank appear to be failing me?

From: [identity profile] sgriobadh.livejournal.com


We're not wanking about research or neo-paganism or evil witches. Hell, if you wanted to wank about that the first two seasons do have some material (anthropology student, here). No, what's bothering us [?] is the show's general tone towards women, whether they be human or Other.

Now, show's always been iffy when it comes to sexism and racism, but this season is far worse than we've ever seen before. I think the wank is coming when some fangirls get up in arms about, uh, feminist meta/concerns. Have you read [livejournal.com profile] sazzlette's post? I got my own personal version of that the first time I posted about the skanky gender issues this season.

So it's become kind of fraught, if you will.

Does that make sense? Some of us think SPN's treating women horribly, and others are up in arms over people harshing their squee.
ext_21906: (Default)

From: [identity profile] chasingtides.livejournal.com


Ok. That makes a bit more sense.

Fandom always harshes you squee. But, the part I'm having trouble with is - why now? How is this season any worse to women (in an not-research-driven-way) than any other season? Personally, I think season one was pretty harsh on women. Then again, I was around for season one, so maybe there was meta/concerns/what-have-you.

From: [identity profile] sgriobadh.livejournal.com


Uh, I'll add you to that filter. Check out my list of links, especially [livejournal.com profile] trollprincess. But they're all worth looking at, IMO.

From: [identity profile] sgriobadh.livejournal.com


here (http://sgriobadh.livejournal.com/29580.html#cutid1). Also check out [livejournal.com profile] esorlehcar.
.

Profile

chasingtides: (Default)
chasingtides

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags